Well, the issue's over now, but I'm still unsure that people knew what they were voting on.
I worked (as I always do) as a Poll Clerk last Thursday and, for a start, the turnout was very low. We had about 30% of the registered voters in our constituency actually turning up which is no great endorsement for democracy, is it? From comments I overheard, most people seemed to be voting 'No' simply to spite Nick Clegg. This hardly seems a rational argument on which to throw out a serious proposal for voting reform. Most of these selfsame voters were clearly anti-Cameron too, but they didn't seem to realise they were merely playing into his hands.
I've often heard it said that you can't fool the British electorate, that they're not stupid and can see beyond the politician's bluffs and blather. Well, from what I've observed over the years, working within many polling stations in my area, the opposite seems to be true. You wouldn't expect many people to read manifestos or seriously consider the implications of eveything at election times. Few people hold degrees in Political Science or Political History. They simply vote by family or regional tradition or do what their chosen newspapers tell them to do. In other words, democracy should be defined as 'Rule by Idiots'. That's what we're left with and that's why we get drawn into illegal wars and disastrous economic policies.
The trouble is that I don't know any better way of doing this.